message from RightMarch.com:
ALERT: Everyone said it
couldn’t happen. "We don’t need a Constitutional Amendment to protect
marriage in America — the states will protect it. Liberal activist
judges can’t impose gay ‘marriage’ on us!"
Then a liberal activist judge did just
that in Massachusetts — imposed gay "marriage" on the state. And it’s
"Don’t worry," they said, "even if
they allow gay ‘marriage’ in a state, it won’t be recognized in other
Then a liberal activist judge in
Washington ruled that, if that state passes a gay "marriage" law, those
"marriages" will be valid in every other state, under the "full faith
and credit" clause of the Constitution.
"Don’t worry," they said, "states can
pass their own constitutional amendments protecting traditional
marriage — at least THAT can’t be struck down!"
Then liberal activist judges in
and Georgia did just that — they ruled that the constitutional
amendments that the citizens of those states had passed were
UNconstitutional! (How is something that’s PART of the constitution
Are you getting the picture? Exactly
we were warned about has come to pass — and it’s getting worse. The
fact is, you can no longer use the argument that "the states should
make these decisions" — the judges won’t let them! Traditional
marriage is under attack in this country like never before in history.
But YOU can do something about it.
The "Marriage Protection Amendment"
Res. 88) is scheduled to be debated and voted on in the U.S. House of
Representatives in the next week. Here’s the text of that Amendment:
"Marriage in the United
States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither
this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be
construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be
conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman."
Pretty simple, isn’t it? If two-thirds of
the House and the Senate can pass that — and then if three-fourths of
the State legislatures ratify it — then it’ll be mighty tough for even
the most liberal, most activist judge to impose his or her own will on
the American people.
THAT will make it all worth it — but
we need YOUR help to do it!
TAKE ACTION: Senator
Allard (R-CO), the sponsor of the Senate version of the Marriage
Protection Amendment, was right when he said, "As the core social
institution of our society, marriage in the United States should be
defined as it has been in every civilization around the world for
thousands of years: marriage is the union between a man and a woman.
The definition of marriage is far too important to leave open to
interpretation by unelected activist courts."
Unbiased polls consistently show that
over half of the American people support a constitutional federal
marriage amendment — but liberal activist judges don’t CARE what the
majority of Americans think. It’s time to change that. Click below NOW
to send a free message to your Representative, asking him or her to
vote FOR H.J. Res. 88, the "Marriage Protection Amendment":
NOTE: Be sure to send this
Alert to EVERYONE you know who wants to help protect traditional
marriage in America. Thank you!
William Greene, President